Messages in this thread | | | From | (H. Peter Anvin) | Subject | Re: ARMS WAVING!!! Proposal to fix /proc dainbrammage. | Date | 23 Oct 1998 23:10:08 GMT |
| |
I presume this referred to ASCII printed form, where I agree bigendian is the appropriate (because that's the way people are used to reading numbers.)
For internal representation there are actually substantial technical advantages with littleendian notation, despite the fact that it appears politically incorrect to say so...
-hpa
Followup to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.981023151556.431A-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> By author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > On Fri, 23 Oct 1998, Perry Harrington wrote: > > > > Not to keep beating a dead horse, but I'd like to solidify the standing > > of endianess in numbers in /proc. I've already proposed creating generic > > formatting routines for /proc info, and I think that the output should be > > big endian for Hex, Binary, and Decimal, as it's significantly easier > > to read and parse. > > I really don't want big endian. I'm used to little endian, and I think > it's fundamentally wrong to prefer one over the other. So if anything is > confusing now, it's not getting better by changing the byte order. It > should just be printed out in a format where byte order doesn't matter. > > Linus -- PGP: 2047/2A960705 BA 03 D3 2C 14 A8 A8 BD 1E DF FE 69 EE 35 BD 74 See http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/ for web page and full PGP public key I am Bahá'í -- ask me about it or see http://www.bahai.org/ "To love another person is to see the face of God." -- Les Misérables
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |