[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: setting access rights to priviledged ports
On Wed, 21 Oct 1998, David Lang wrote:

> does sendmail actually close the socket? I thought it maintained control
> of the socket and just closed each connection as it was opened.

You cannot get 'connection refused' from a bound-to socket. So yes, it
does close it.


> On Wed, 21 Oct 1998, Ion Badulescu wrote:
> > And btw even sendmail can be convinced to shut down, quite trivially --
> > just cause the load to go over the limit set in and sendmail
> > will close its socket. Then you are free to bind to it if the port is over
> > 1023.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.031 / U:5.196 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site