lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linus is on a powertrip..
On 2 Oct 1998, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:

> Yes, we must remove pressure from Linus as a person. But not by
> implementing a patch approval commitee and a closing up policy.

Agreed. And further more, the simplest way to reduce pressure is
to accept just the 'way he wants it' and to follow it.
( don't forget, he's the copyright holder anyway )

Given the enormous Linux users pool (estimated 8 million?), there ever
will be a lot of 'patch noise' and Linus can't apply it all anyway.
If we now try to 'administer' the noise in order to not loose anything,
even a very clever strategy cannot avoid, that the queue accumulates to
death.

On the other side, the way Linus handles patch input will lead to sort
of 'Darwinisme' such that only the 'strongest' (re-posted often) demands
for inclusion will succeed. This 'filters' by itself.

So, just accept Linus' way to handle it. As he often says (and is right
saying it): the simple solutions are the most stable (and effective) ones.

Hans
<lermen@dosemu.org>




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:44    [W:0.042 / U:0.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site