[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.2 missing features
> In future it would be useful to adopt a policy to never accept changes for
> 2.0 unless 2.1 has the equivalent bug fix/change

Unfortunately this is completely impractical. 2.1.x is frequently not stable
enough for some people to work on. Drivers are done 2.0.x first by most
commercial oriented bodies and many users, all the network stack improvements
for amateur radio where done 2.0.x first and ported into 2.1.x at the end
of things after the updates had been available for 2.0.x for a year or so.

I'm trying to keep 2.0.x change histories to avoid this kind of problem as well
as the notes for each applied patch in .34/.35/.36. I've got 400 or so pieces
of saved diffs and notes to hand from this

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.091 / U:2.660 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site