lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: "per-process" limits (was: Showstopper list)
    On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 03:15:05PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
    >
    > The first problem doesn't occur if credential changes are
    > broadcast instead of being physically shared.
    > Both problems could be fixed if the relevant procedures in the
    > kernel would take explicit "effective credentials" parameters
    > instead of retrieving them from the task struct.
    >

    If you can manage to do this without any significant performance
    degradation, I think it is a very good idea. access() is currently a
    hack.

    astor

    --
    Alexander Kjeldaas, Guardian Networks AS, Trondheim, Norway
    http://www.guardian.no/

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [W:0.020 / U:30.020 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site