lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: "per-process" limits (was: Showstopper list)
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 03:15:05PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>
> The first problem doesn't occur if credential changes are
> broadcast instead of being physically shared.
> Both problems could be fixed if the relevant procedures in the
> kernel would take explicit "effective credentials" parameters
> instead of retrieving them from the task struct.
>

If you can manage to do this without any significant performance
degradation, I think it is a very good idea. access() is currently a
hack.

astor

--
Alexander Kjeldaas, Guardian Networks AS, Trondheim, Norway
http://www.guardian.no/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans