lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: LSF and SOCK_PACKET
Yeah I screwed up.  I didn't realize that only socket level setsockopts
were generic.

On another note:

Has anyone given any thought to having a BIND_TO_TCP_PORT type option
for SOCK_PACKET?

The reason I ask that if one wanted to use SOCK_PACKET for more than
traffic monitoring (ie. user level networking) this would be a very
useful feature (although it could be argued it breaks all kind of layer
abstractions).

I would be interested in hearing the best ways of going about this.

-Garth


Excerpts from mail: 16-Oct-98 Re: LSF and SOCK_PACKET by Andi Kleen@muc.de
> of the LL/DL code) in 2.1. Then SO_ATTACH_FILTER/
> SO_DETACH_FILTER are generic socket options that are handled by
> core/sock.c for all socket types, the receiving filter is in
include/net/sock.h
> (that is what I missed in my first mail).


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans