Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Oct 1998 19:55:44 +0200 (CEST) | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: 2.1.125 Show stopper list: Draft |
| |
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Rik van Riel wrote:
>gotten rid of. Then I go on to hand you the fix, >only to have my arguments completely ignored by >you and to be continuously insulted with blatant >statements like this.
I don' t insult _you_. I simply don' t agree with your code and I say my reasons.
And as second I continue to think my patch doesn' t need changes because it' s just very near to stall with kswapd running all the time and it' s far from failing allocating memory here. If somewhere it will fail I' d like to know.
I am ignoring your "bad 2.1.8x days" argument just because many many things are changed from 2.1.8x and I can' t trust your "it' s the same" beacuse it _can' t_ be the same. There are so many differences that you can' t prove that my patch fail allocating memory because 8x was doing so. Please don't ask me to trust such assumption (or to download 2.1.8x ;-).
>If you don't want to answer to the real questions >that I give, then don't answer the post at all.
OK.
Andrea Arcangeli
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |