[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: sysctl() considered harmful
    On Mon, 5 Jan 1998 wrote:

    > Maybe we should throw out sysctl(), before some author
    > thinks that she can use it.
    > Andries

    Err, yes, and no. I tried to merge proc and sysctl during my work on
    a proc2... It's easy for new things (with a new interface), but for the
    old ones compatiblity is important?? (seems not to be the case as you

    So well, a binary interface to some features is good, IMHO.


    PS: I thought of using printf/scanf like strings in a generic proc solution.
    The binary interface would be just copying things around.

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.017 / U:6.588 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site