[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: sysctl() considered harmful
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998 wrote:

> Maybe we should throw out sysctl(), before some author
> thinks that she can use it.
> Andries

Err, yes, and no. I tried to merge proc and sysctl during my work on
a proc2... It's easy for new things (with a new interface), but for the
old ones compatiblity is important?? (seems not to be the case as you

So well, a binary interface to some features is good, IMHO.


PS: I thought of using printf/scanf like strings in a generic proc solution.
The binary interface would be just copying things around.

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.055 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site