lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: gcc-2.8.0 miscompiles kernel (Was: gcc-2.8 out...)
Date
> Hmmmmm, are you _sure_  that's a bug ? The  cast says that the pointed
> value is volatile, not the pointer itself. So the compiler can, I
> think, still legally assume that the memory zone assigned through the
> pointer will be destroyed after the return.

Oh bog.. I do indeed have the volabloodytile keyword in the wrong place
yes. Try it as he suggested and lets see

> *((u32 * volatile)&eflags)=val; should make it behave though. I'm not
> really sure. That's quite a tricky part of the standard.

Alan


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.064 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site