[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: devfs
    On Wed, 14 Jan 1998, Leonard N. Zubkoff wrote:
    > I guess I could live with that. It would actually bring things more
    > into line with Solaris 2 (except that we have a bus identifier as
    > well).
    > However, since you raise this again, Leonard, what about the issue of
    > slices within a partition? It appears that Solaris two places multiple
    > slices inside a standard MS-DOS-style partition. What would you
    > suggest to handle that? How about:
    > /dev/sd/c0b0t0d0p1s6 :-)
    > Ugh. I sure hope we don't need both "p" and "s". My only Solaris experience
    > is on the SPARC, and there's no "p" in use there. Do we really need both?

    If you look at Solaris/Intel and *BSD/Intel and want to be able to
    keep a consistent naming sheme we need it. All of them have slices
    _within_ partitions.


     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.018 / U:4.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site