[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: devfs

how about this?


There. that should make everyone happy...

first part after the /dev describes the type of device so
you can have /dev/scd/.... , /dev/sgd

and preserve all the current names


> >
> > > Leonard: what's your view on the placement of these devices:
> > >
> > > /dev/sd_h0c0t0u0p2 OR:
> > > /dev/disc/sd_h0c0t0u0p2
> >
> > how about /dev/dsk/h0c0t0u0p2? lose the sd_. it doesn't buy you anything.
> > ide drives are done differently anyways.
> This naming scheme should be used for 'non-disk' scsi devices top. Please
> dont put them in /dev/disk or anything.. But please do lose the sd_
> > as far as the id changing. I think leonard was refering to the case where you
> > have a standard IDE disk and scsi based say jaz drive... if scsi is compiled as
> > a module and the jaz is mounted, unmounted and remounted, problems appear.
> >
> > --Jauder

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO RECIPIENTS: The Entire Physical Universe, Including
This Product, May One Day Collapse Back Into an Infinitesimally Small
Space. Should Another Universe Subsequently and Spontaneously Re-Emerge,
the Existence of This Message in That Universe Cannot be Guaranteed.

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.166 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site