Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 Jan 1998 22:02:06 -0500 (EST) | From | linux kernel account <> | Subject | Re: devfs |
| |
On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Mitch Adair wrote:
> For the ultimate in pure esthetics: > > /dev/sd/c0b0t0d0s0 >
OHHH! AHH!! This is almost PERFECT!
c0b0t0d0p0
The (actually, I think I logically prefer a u to a d.. but it SOUND so much better saying c0b0t0d0p0.. and it's very easy to type..)!
Just say it.. Feel it flow.. :)
> (but I think I'm repeating myself here :) > > Honestly though - the h(ost) is fine the (u)nit is ok the (p)artition I > can live with, but I would recommend changing the c(hannel) to b(us) > If we are going to be different from Solaris (or SVr* as someone pointed out) > then let's at least not conflict with the other name scheme (ie > c(ontroller) vs c(hannel)) Would that be ok? > > Mitch > (/dev/sd/h0b0t0u0p0 I could happily live with...) > > > > > versus > > > > /dev/dsk/sd_h0c0t0u0s2 > > > > I think I personally would prefer the former. > > > > Leonard > > >
| |