[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: devfs
Leonard N. Zubkoff writes:
> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 10:33:04 -0800 (PST)
> From: Jauder Ho <>
> how about this?
> /dev/sd/h0c0t0u0p2
> There. that should make everyone happy...
> first part after the /dev describes the type of device so
> you can have /dev/scd/.... , /dev/sgd
> and preserve all the current names
> I think either /dev/dsk/sd_... or /dev/sd/... are both reasonable choices.
> I am now wondering what the rationale is for using "p" rather than "s" for the
> partition number. I cannot think of any particularly compelling reason for
> either choice. "p" is somewhat more mnemonic, but I find "s" slightly more
> esthetic (since "p" would be the only character with a descender) and it is
> compatible with other systems. So how about:
> /dev/sd/h0c0t0u0s2
> versus
> /dev/dsk/sd_h0c0t0u0s2
> I think I personally would prefer the former.

I recall someone telling me that Solaris "stripes" are not actually
partitions. Their strips fit inside a "real" partition. Is that
I don't really find the "s" clear.

Also, how about:



 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.097 / U:0.852 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site