lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: PROPOSAL: /proc/dev
Bill Broadhurst writes:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 1998 at 01:30:10PM +1100, Richard Gooch wrote:
>
> > You may want to disable major&minor support for devfs-capable drivers
> > so that you *know* that you are using devfs.
> > Anyway, I've just added a new config option CONFIG_DEVFS_ONLY which is
> > off by default, so you will have support for both.
>
> Well, add one for NO_DEVFS too for those of us who don't want ANY devfs.
> I don't/won't have one as I see no reason to ever do this. Just as I
> have no kerneld on my systems. If I want the users to have it I'll
> compile it into the kernel.

I think you'll find that your NO_DEVFS has the same effect as my
CONFIG_DEVFS_FS, which is disabled by default. So the default
behaviour is that nothing is changed.

Regards,

Richard....

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.241 / U:0.884 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site