Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.0.33 versus 2.0.31 teardrop patch | From | (Aaron M. Ucko) | Date | 01 Jan 1998 11:45:35 -0600 |
| |
Edward Welbon <welbon@bga.com> writes:
> patch. So has the method of handling frgamentation been dealt with in > other ways such requiring the reversal of the 2.0.31-teardrop patch?
There were multiple teardrop patches; the one you applied apparently didn't interfere with the one that made it into the standard kernel.
> Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
"stercus fit." :-)
-- Aaron M. Ucko <amu@mit.edu> (finger amu@monk.mit.edu) [Stark raving sane]
| |