lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1998]   [Jan]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: 2.0.33 versus 2.0.31 teardrop patch
From
Date
Edward Welbon <welbon@bga.com> writes:

> patch. So has the method of handling frgamentation been dealt with in
> other ways such requiring the reversal of the 2.0.31-teardrop patch?

There were multiple teardrop patches; the one you applied apparently
didn't interfere with the one that made it into the standard kernel.

> Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.

"stercus fit." :-)

--
Aaron M. Ucko <amu@mit.edu> (finger amu@monk.mit.edu) [Stark raving sane]

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:41    [W:0.113 / U:0.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site