lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Solaris 2.6 and Linux
Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
> > Here's the concept: source code broker doesn't charge anything to
> > the people providing source, but charges clients who order the
> > source the nominal distribution charge.

Darin Johnson <darin@connectnet.com> wrote:
> I don't think this would be allowed, under some readings of the GPL.
> After all, since FSF ftp sites are widely known, why the requirement
> that we additionally provide the code via ftp if the customer asks?
> The way the phrasing reads to me, there is no provision for passing
> the customer's request off to someone else.

Note that the FSF does allow just pointing at the code for
non-commercial efforts. Anyways, unless you're trying to
commit fraud, I don't see the problem with hiring someone
else to do publishing for you.

--
Raul

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans