[lkml]   [1997]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Solaris 2.6 and Linux
    Raul Miller <>
    > > Here's the concept: source code broker doesn't charge anything to
    > > the people providing source, but charges clients who order the
    > > source the nominal distribution charge.

    Darin Johnson <> wrote:
    > I don't think this would be allowed, under some readings of the GPL.
    > After all, since FSF ftp sites are widely known, why the requirement
    > that we additionally provide the code via ftp if the customer asks?
    > The way the phrasing reads to me, there is no provision for passing
    > the customer's request off to someone else.

    Note that the FSF does allow just pointing at the code for
    non-commercial efforts. Anyways, unless you're trying to
    commit fraud, I don't see the problem with hiring someone
    else to do publishing for you.


     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.019 / U:1.708 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site