[lkml]   [1997]   [Sep]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Solaris 2.6 and Linux

    On Sun, 28 Sep 1997, Darin Johnson wrote:

    > I don't think this would be allowed, under some readings of the GPL.
    > After all, since FSF ftp sites are widely known, why the requirement
    > that we additionally provide the code via ftp if the customer asks?
    > The way the phrasing reads to me, there is no provision for passing
    > the customer's request off to someone else.

    It says that you can pass it off if you are noncommercial.
    Heres what I'de say: "We can provide it for you on CD, but I would highly
    recommend you get it from or buy a cd from or call redhat a (xxx)-xxx-xxx" This will get rid of
    99.9% of the people.. If they still insist you sell them a cd you can
    tell them it will cost $200 as this would reflect your expence of buying a
    CDR, Media, and paying somone to make the CDs when you will do at the most
    a few CDs a year..

    OR... Even better (and alot less legaly grey):

    Tell 'em it'll be $20, get their name and address, etc.. Call up infomagic
    "Yes, I'd like the linux developers resource shipped to.." In this
    situation it should make everyone happy.. It doesn't say you can't pay
    someone else to do it for you.. In the future, if the GPL isn't changed in
    this regard, I can see companies sprouting up for this purpose alone.

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.018 / U:6.868 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site