[lkml]   [1997]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Subject64bit dev_t (was: Re: /proc/pci)
    On Thu, 25 Sep 1997, Michael Neuffer wrote:
    > On Mon, 22 Sep 1997, Teunis Peters wrote:
    > > On the flip side, /proc means that the SCSI-silliness (moving /sdX based
    > > on which appeared first) won't happen.
    > >[...]
    > > We definitely need some kind of /proc and make sure it's fast though.
    > > [pity we can't boot off of /proc/scsi/ID...]
    > For this to be implemented cleanly, we still need to make the transition
    > to a larger dev_t (32 or even better 64bit) inside the kernel.
    > glibc2/libc6 already supports a 64bit dev_t.

    Any chances this will be done in 2.1.x? If it won't it will be for 2.3.x (or
    3.1.x?), and we all know that then we won't see it in a stable version before
    1999 (possibly interfering with the release of Win98? :-) ...



    Geert Uytterhoeven
    Wavelets, Linux/{m68k~Amiga,PPC~CHRP}
    Department of Computer Science -- Katholieke Universiteit Leuven -- Belgium

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.024 / U:2.516 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site