Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 15 Sep 1997 21:14:01 +0200 | From | Martin Mares <> | Subject | Re: Pentium __delay weirdness... the final results (longish) |
| |
Hi,
> > Here's the final summary all numbers are in cycles as reported by rdtsc. > > This is using a set of assembly that executes the entire timing loop twice, > > in an effort to get the caching right. > > for my Intel PODP83 things are different (worse) which is why I started > this whole thread...
Can anyone tell me why do we inline the udelay code? Making it a separate function IMHO won't cause any harm and all alignment problems would be gone.
Have a nice fortnight -- Martin `MJ' Mares <mj@gts.cz> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/ Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth "What's the difference between '486 and Pentium? About 2.10^-4"
| |