lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Pentium __delay weirdness... the final results (longish)
Hi,

> > Here's the final summary all numbers are in cycles as reported by rdtsc.
> > This is using a set of assembly that executes the entire timing loop twice,
> > in an effort to get the caching right.
>
> for my Intel PODP83 things are different (worse) which is why I started
> this whole thread...

Can anyone tell me why do we inline the udelay code? Making it a separate
function IMHO won't cause any harm and all alignment problems would be gone.

Have a nice fortnight
--
Martin `MJ' Mares <mj@gts.cz> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/
Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
"What's the difference between '486 and Pentium? About 2.10^-4"

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.127 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site