lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: New pre-2.0.31 patches..
How is that possible? I thought that the code only looked for more than
64M if the normal routines reported 64M... Thus, even if the probe for
>64M of RAM failed you'd still have your 64M and you'd have to use an
append statement or such... If this isn't how it works, maybe it should?
-Rob H.

On Tue, 5 Aug 1997, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:

> >
> > I'm curious; what other systems does it break? I don't use lma's
> > memory patch myself (having a far superior one that I authored),
> > but since the largest difference between his and mine is that he
> > uses int15,ah=c7, it shouldn't be failing on other systems.
>
> few days ago ther was a mail on this list ... only 1M detected of
> 64M. Some BIOS do not work proper for this detection code.
>
> Werner
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.075 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site