Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 6 Aug 1997 10:23:48 -0400 (EDT) | From | Rob Hagopian <> | Subject | Re: New pre-2.0.31 patches.. |
| |
How is that possible? I thought that the code only looked for more than 64M if the normal routines reported 64M... Thus, even if the probe for >64M of RAM failed you'd still have your 64M and you'd have to use an append statement or such... If this isn't how it works, maybe it should? -Rob H.
On Tue, 5 Aug 1997, Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
> > > > I'm curious; what other systems does it break? I don't use lma's > > memory patch myself (having a far superior one that I authored), > > but since the largest difference between his and mine is that he > > uses int15,ah=c7, it shouldn't be failing on other systems. > > few days ago ther was a mail on this list ... only 1M detected of > 64M. Some BIOS do not work proper for this detection code. > > Werner >
| |