[lkml]   [1997]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: buffer cache patches - anybody willing to summarize?
    Jeff Wiegley <> writes:

    > But, since the main purpose of 2.1.X -> 2.2/3.0 is the inclusion of
    > proper and complete SMP support, I don't think that any SMP patches
    > should be considered for the 2.0 tree. Only if they fix a gross security

    All SMP _bugfixes_ should go into 2.0. 2.2 improves SMP performance,
    not reliability.

    > SMP in 2.0 is ALPHA code, use at your own risk. If you really

    It was alpha a year ago. SMP was one of the flagship claims of 2.0.
    SMP and multi-platform support were chief reasons for numbering it 2.0
    instead of 1.4.


    Pete Harlan
    Disclaimer: I've never used SMP.

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.029 / U:1.552 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site