Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Jul 97 21:57 MET DST | From | (Hans-Joachim Baader) | Subject | Re: What stable kernel? |
| |
In article <199707090829.KAA22744@mvmap66.ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de> you write: >What's a reasonable stable kernel that will work in most circumstances? > >2.0.30 has lots of things broken (proxying, memory handling).
My server obviously doesn't know of this :-) It runs fine since 73 days uptime now. I have installed another server with 2.0.30 in our office which works as http proxy, news proxy and news server exclusively. Also without any problems yet, uptime more than a week now.
>2.0.29 doesn't work for other people.
It worked fine for me. Perhaps it would be an even better solution than 2.0.30.
>What's the most reasonable kernel that will work for most applications? >Or has the idea of a stable, generally usable kernel been dropped while >I wasn't listening?
If this wasn't the case any longer, I could as well buy WinCrap NT...
hjb
-- Uncle Ed's Rule of Thumb: Never use your thumb for a rule. You'll either hit it with a hammer or get a splinter in it.
| |