Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 09 Jul 1997 11:05:17 +0200 | From | "Antonio Dell'elce" <> | Subject | Re: 2.1.44 |
| |
>> 2.1.44pre3 wasnt bad - in fact its been the best for a while. 2.1.44 is >> a bit of a disaster. It doesnt boot, and on the odd combination of settings >> that do boot it scrambles your disk
>I found that .44pre2 was fairly stable, pre3 caused almost all files in
>/proc to have the mode "?---------" some files occasionally had the owner >r or owner rw and occasionally directories such as "net" would actually
>appear to be directories. Other than /proc though, everything appeared
>normal with pre3.
>> The responsible thing to do would surely to be to rename it 2.1.44pre4 before >> it does further needless damage. I've no problem with 2.1.x having odd suprises >> like sometimes eating bits of disks - it is test code, but now we know its >> extremely dangerous moving it from the normal place would be smart.
I have found no problem with 2.1.44pre3 not even in /proc... I will keep this configuration waiting for 2.1.45 :P
-- Antonio Dell'elce -- also at uh886@freenet.victoria.bc.ca
| |