Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: kernel documentation is bad | Date | Tue, 22 Jul 1997 15:19:57 PDT | From | "Marty Leisner" <> |
| |
I don't think clean code has to be heavily documented...but it a good idea for global structures to be documented...I just was looking at the sysrq.c module which failed on 2.1.46 since f_inode isn't defined anymore...
From past experience, it is far more important to document the data, instead of the code...
BTW...the include/linux directory has 300 files...more subdirectories (IMHO) are welcome there).
-- marty leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com The Feynman problem solving Algorithm 1) Write down the problem 2) Think real hard 3) Write down the answer Murray Gel-mann in the NY Times
| |