[lkml]   [1997]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Could this be part of the Boomerang problem?
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> These two lines are "if( set_bit( .... ) )".
> It seems that the "set_bit" function is (or is now) a void function.

The function was not used as "set_bit" but as "test_and_set_bit".
These were integrated into one function called "set_bit" but nowadays
there are two. One is called "set_bit" and it will only do that. There
is also a function "test_and_set_bit" which will do what it says.

Nice opportunity to submit your first kernel patch.


 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [W:0.030 / U:8.680 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site