lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Out of memory kernel death (fwd)
Date
From
Forwarded message:
> From owner-linux-kernel-outgoing@vger.rutgers.edu Wed May 7 21:34:12 1997
> Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 23:13:15 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: bert hubert <ahu@vvtp.tn.tudelft.nl>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
> Subject: Re: Out of memory kernel death
> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970507165948.121E-100000@jennifer.epix.net>
> Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970507231222.6382A-100000@vvtp.tn.tudelft.nl>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
> Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
> Precedence: bulk
>
>
> On Wed, 7 May 1997, James Mastros wrote:
>
> > > This is getting uglier & uglier, but let's be pragmatic and make it kill
> > > the largest process NOT called "X".
> > >
> > Or ending in "d" (as in daemon)? Or before "e" except after "c", or when
> > sounding like "ahy" as in "neighoubor" or "wheiy?" <SP>? Where does the
> > uglyness stop? If we are going to do somthing like this, lets do it
> > right. How does adding in "with no sub-processes" sound?
I didn't follow the whole thread , but wouldn't it be logical to kill the
process who tried to get the memory (unless id is < 10)?


--
...Marko
------------------------///////////-\\\\\\\\\\\--------------------------
(O) ^ ^ (O)
Marko Siladin | | | VCU, Dept. of Math. Science
msiladin@athos.mas.vcu.edu \ / Division of Computer Science
http://www.mas.vcu.edu/grad/marko/home.html
------------------------\\\\\\\\\\\-///////////--------------------------

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [W:0.186 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site