Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Out of memory kernel death (fwd) | Date | Thu, 8 May 1997 13:13:59 -0400 (EDT) | From | "Marko Siladin" <> |
| |
Forwarded message: > From owner-linux-kernel-outgoing@vger.rutgers.edu Wed May 7 21:34:12 1997 > Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 23:13:15 +0200 (MET DST) > From: bert hubert <ahu@vvtp.tn.tudelft.nl> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu > Subject: Re: Out of memory kernel death > In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970507165948.121E-100000@jennifer.epix.net> > Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970507231222.6382A-100000@vvtp.tn.tudelft.nl> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) > Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu > Precedence: bulk > > > On Wed, 7 May 1997, James Mastros wrote: > > > > This is getting uglier & uglier, but let's be pragmatic and make it kill > > > the largest process NOT called "X". > > > > > Or ending in "d" (as in daemon)? Or before "e" except after "c", or when > > sounding like "ahy" as in "neighoubor" or "wheiy?" <SP>? Where does the > > uglyness stop? If we are going to do somthing like this, lets do it > > right. How does adding in "with no sub-processes" sound? I didn't follow the whole thread , but wouldn't it be logical to kill the process who tried to get the memory (unless id is < 10)?
-- ...Marko ------------------------///////////-\\\\\\\\\\\-------------------------- (O) ^ ^ (O) Marko Siladin | | | VCU, Dept. of Math. Science msiladin@athos.mas.vcu.edu \ / Division of Computer Science http://www.mas.vcu.edu/grad/marko/home.html ------------------------\\\\\\\\\\\-///////////--------------------------
| |