[lkml]   [1997]   [May]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Static naming schemes for devices/partitions (was: SCSI disk devices)
On Sun, 4 May 1997, Dave Cinege wrote:

> Main problem with this - What about IDE?
> Those drives don't count? Any labeling scheme should be kernel based. I
> would recommend handling the scsi naming versus the labeling issue
> separately.

With IDE, the slave drive (in my humble experience) would always be
hdb, and the master (or sole) drive would be hda.

Sure, that's assuming that you only have one bus, but the first drive on
the second bus is hdc, the first drive on the third is hde, etc.

J. S. Connell | Systems Adminstrator, ICONZ. Any opinions stated above | are not my employers', not my boyfriends', my God's, my | friends', and probably not even my own.
PGP key at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [W:0.024 / U:3.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site