lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Alpha 500 vs Bi Ppro.
On Thu, 15 May 1997, Yann DUPONT wrote:

> Hello. We are testing some new machines, and I'd like to hear
> experiences from others ...
>
> Today we were comparing
> a Bi Ppro 200 (128 Mo Ram) & A No-name Alpha 500 Mhz (21164 Ev5) 256 Mo Ram
> 1Mo cache.
>
> Both were loaded with redHat 4.2. (Linux 2.0.30)
>
> To our great disapointment, it seems that the pentium Pro is faster
> than the Alpha. We weren't expecting that.
>
> Ok, maybe we didn't test it the right way, and we will give it another
> try with a more serious benchmark. Anyway, today we tested:
>
> Compilation :
>
> For exemple we compiled Python 1.4
> (make -j)
>
> on bip (Bi pentium pro) => 26 sec.
>
> on Alpha => 57 sec
>
> Ok, maybe the code generation on alpha is longer ?

Even if the Alpha is twice as fast, the PPro is running SMP, so two
process run at the same time. Especially for processor-intensive jobs
such as compiling, you will have better performance with an SMP machine.


---
Christophe Dupre
CIC Web Publishing, inc.

"Nous ne sommes pas libres de ne pas etre libres, nous sommes obliges de
l'etre" - Fernando Savater

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s:++ a-- C++(+++) UL++++$ UISV++ P++ L++++ !E W+++$ N+ o? K w++>--
O M+ V-- PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R+ tv+ b++ DI+ D+ G+ e++ h--- r++ z+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

#include <disclaimer.h>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [W:0.054 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site