lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: procfs problems
On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Tim Hollebeek wrote:

> How much more complex is a /bin/proccat that (for example) changes null
> terminated key:value pairs into text? E.g. the proc files would contain
> something like:
>
> "key1\0val1\0key2\0val2\0..."
>
> which would translate to:
>
> key1 : val1
> key2 : val2
> ...

What on earth *FOR*??? It's not that much more difficult to parse
the human readable version anyway. Anyone who can't write the
code has better things to worry about than kernel hacking anyway :-).

I think the point of this thread got lost a good few messages
back...

Mike

--
.----------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Mike Jagdis | Internet: mailto:mike@roan.co.uk |
| Roan Technology Ltd. | |
| 54A Peach Street, Wokingham | Telephone: +44 118 989 0403 |
| RG40 1XG, ENGLAND | Fax: +44 118 989 1195 |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------'

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans