lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: Solaris source (fwd)
Date

Personally, I think it's GREAT that Sun may be competing with Linux.
What better marketing can we have? ("Gee, Sun thinks Linux is a genuine
threat. Maybe it's a real OS after all - I'd better check it out!")

======= B.C. Hydro and Power Authority ===========
Lloyd Sumpter PHONE: (604)528-3078
Protection and Control FAX: (604)528-1883
Vancouver, Canada
>----------
>From: David S. Miller[SMTP:davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 1997 4:35 PM
>To: consp05@binghamton.edu
>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
>Subject: Re: Solaris source (fwd)
>
> From: "SethMeister G." <consp05@binghamton.edu>
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 19:24:30 -0400 (EDT)
>
> I don't think (despite what that dude from SGI said) that Sun is
> competing with Linux, nor do I beleive that it is their aim. Being
> a Sun employee myself (and no I don't speak for them) I can tell
> you this for certain.
>
>Then what possible other aim could they possibly have, especially
>since they mention Linux specifically as one of the incentives behind
>their "free Solaris source" marketing announcement?
>
>I don't know, if they have other real incentives behind this act, so
>be it. But people are certainly going to view it as being a "Sun
>vs. Linux" thing no matter what the truth actually is.
>
>---------------------------------------------////
>Yow! 11.26 MB/s remote host TCP bandwidth & ////
>199 usec remote TCP latency over 100Mb/s ////
>ethernet. Beat that! ////
>-----------------------------------------////__________ o
>David S. Miller, davem@caip.rutgers.edu /_____________/ / // /_/ ><
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans