[lkml]   [1997]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: thousands of threads & kernel continuations
In message <>,
Michael Callahan <> writes
>I agree with what Alan, David and others have said about 1000s of threads
>being the wrong answer to the question--essentially no matter what the
>question is. (This is assuming you don't have a machine with 1000s of
Exactly - If you only have 5 CPUs you can only ever have 5 threads
actively run on CPUs at the same time. Perhaps a few more to handle
disk I/O, one if you use Kernel Asyncchronous I/O and a few to handle
network actively, Informix RBBMS recommond one per 200-300 users i.e.

Why have more??

David Williams

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [W:0.030 / U:12.300 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site