Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 Apr 1997 00:52:34 -0400 (EDT) | From | Jon Lewis <> | Subject | Re: v2.0.30 |
| |
On Tue, 15 Apr 1997, Stephen Zedalis wrote:
> SMP implementation). I'm glad you are working on a cleaner > implementation, but several people are using the current no_atime, and > the new fragment will cause patch to complain about patch hunk previously > applied. Thats all I was trying to say.
It's fairly trivial though to patch in your patch collection and then do a find . -name "*.rej" and then bring up each file and it's .rej counterpart in your favorite split screen editor and manually examine/fix things like this. It took a few seconds to see that one hunk of the no_atime patch failed because it was already there.
Maybe Linus left the define in because he plans to use the flag later, but didn't like the rest of the implementation. It didn't really matter to me at the time.
------------------------------------------------------------------ Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/hr. ________Finger jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______
| |