Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Apr 1997 14:09:08 -0700 (PDT) | From | root <> | Subject | Re: procfs problems |
| |
On Tue, 15 Apr 1997, Miguel de Icaza wrote: > > > /proc/cpuinfo: > > > port : {i386,alpha,sparc,ppc,mips} > > I would defiantly disagree in this part. Putting arch instead of port > > would be ok. I think technically speaking i386 isn't a port of linux, > > because it started there. > First of all, who cares if it started there. > > Problem with architecture is that we may want to have: port: sparc; > architecture: sun4c/sun4m/sun4d. On the other hand, probably > architecture on the SPARC could be named something else.
How about:
architecture sparc platform sun4c cpu MB86900/1A cpu_vendor Fujitsu
architecture 680x0 platform sun3 cpu 68030 cpu_vendor Motorola
architecture 80x86 platform pc-at cpu 80486 cpu_vendor AMD
(Tabs to separate fields. Fields may contain spaces.)
-Dan
| |