lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: procfs problems
On Tue, 15 Apr 1997, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > > /proc/cpuinfo:
> > > port : {i386,alpha,sparc,ppc,mips}
> > I would defiantly disagree in this part. Putting arch instead of port
> > would be ok. I think technically speaking i386 isn't a port of linux,
> > because it started there.
> First of all, who cares if it started there.
>
> Problem with architecture is that we may want to have: port: sparc;
> architecture: sun4c/sun4m/sun4d. On the other hand, probably
> architecture on the SPARC could be named something else.

How about:

architecture sparc
platform sun4c
cpu MB86900/1A
cpu_vendor Fujitsu

architecture 680x0
platform sun3
cpu 68030
cpu_vendor Motorola

architecture 80x86
platform pc-at
cpu 80486
cpu_vendor AMD

(Tabs to separate fields. Fields may contain spaces.)

-Dan


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:39    [W:0.112 / U:0.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site