Messages in this thread | | | From | (Pierfrancesco Caci) | Subject | Re: Oops in 2.1.28... (while stress testing :-) | Date | Tue, 11 Mar 1997 07:49:11 +0100 (CET) |
| |
Bryn Paul Arnold Jones' own words: :-> :-> On Mon, 10 Mar 1997, Matthew Kirkwood wrote: :-> :-> > On Mon, 10 Mar 1997, Patrick Schaaf wrote: :-> >=20 :-> > > > I tried it on /proc and got more Oopses (in proc_lookupfd) than :-> > > The oops is easily reproduced by 'cat /proc/misc', at least on this= :-> machine. :-> > > Kernel is plain 2.1.28, no top or other things running. And the bea= :-> st looks :-> > > stable in all other regards. :-> >=20 :-> > Hmm... For little or no reason, I don't actually _have_ a /proc/misc= :-> . :-> >=20 :-> > Matthew. :-> >=20 :-> hmm, mine sais: :-> UWVS=FE|$ =FEt$,=A1TXA=FED$=C7D$=FE=EC :-> UWVS=FE|$ =FEt$,=A1TXA=FED$=C7D$=FE=EC :-> UWVS=FE|$ =FEt$,=A1TXA=FE=> and I get this:
root:/home/ik5pvx # cat /proc/misc cat: /proc/misc: Bad address Segmentation fault (core dumped)
If someone is interested in the core file I can mail it to him :-)
Kernel 2.1.28, no patches applied. Up since yesterday on a low usage machine, executed from inside X. What *should* /proc/misc show instead?
Pf
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pierfrancesco Caci | internet: | ik5pvx | ik5pvx@infogroup.it | Office for the Complication Firenze - Italia | | of Otherwise Simple Affairs Linux penny 2.1.28 #3 Tue Mar 4 08:45:13 MET 1997 i586 unknown
| |