[lkml]   [1997]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: MMX for kernel
> If there were many, many proceses which used the FPU, one could imagine
> an advisory bit which meant "when task switching to this process,
> immediately restore my FPU registers, since I'm an intensive FPU
> user".

wouldn't only 2 FP-intensive (compute) processes be enough for this scenario ?

> This would avoid the hardware fault after each task switch to
> that process if there were many processes using the FPU. However, this
> hasn't been implemented yet, and in practice it hasn't seemed to have
> been a problem.

and what about runnung 2+ FP cmopute jobs on a dual-PPro200 (SMP) machine ?
how often do processes switch from one CPU to another needing to save/reload
FPU registers and hardware faults ?

any rough estimation how much benefit it might be to add such a flag
for FP-bound processes if Linux is only used as "compute server" ?

All SCSI disks will from now on ___ _____
be required to send an email notice 0--,| /OOOOOOO\
24 hours prior to complete hardware failure! <_/ / /OOOOOOOOOOO\
Harald Koenig, \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Inst.f.Theoret.Astrophysik // / \\ \ ^^^^^ ^^^^^

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.046 / U:0.856 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site