[lkml]   [1997]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: MMX performance....
In article <> Phillip G Ezolt <> writes:
From what I understand, everytime you switch between MMX mode and regular
FP mode, 100 or so cycles are burned. If you are context switching
alot (any multitasking enviornment), this would seem to add up.

Assuming that the "cycles" are fundamental CPU cycles (as opposed to
memory accesses, or something), that could take 1 microsecond or less
(depending on your clock speed), which isn't much. Even better, if
you arrange that the kernel doesn't use either FP or MMX, then MMX/FP
switches can only happen when switching user processes, which is
fairly infrequent -- and the MMX/FP switchover overhead is probably
much smaller than the scheduler overhead.

Dale R. Worley Ariadne Internet Services
Voice: +1 617-899-7949 Fax: +1 617-899-7946 E-mail:
"Internet-based electronic commerce solutions to real business problems."

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.245 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site