Messages in this thread | | | From | "Andrew E. Mileski" <> | Subject | Re: romfs | Date | Sat, 15 Feb 1997 20:06:40 -0500 (EST) |
| |
> The only possible problem with iso9660 is that it isn't > particularly efficient WRT memory usage. In the directory structures, > numbers are frequently stored in both endian formats to make them easily > readable on both big and little endian systems. There is also 32Kb of > unused space at the very beginning of the disc.
Well, if you are doing CD-R, burning ext2 (or any writeable fs) is a lot simpler. I doubt if it is extremely efficient though, but for the time and effort it saves (don't have to bother creating iso9660 images), it is worth it IMHO.
-- Andrew E. Mileski mailto:aem@netcom.ca Linux Plug-and-Play Kernel Project http://www.redhat.com/linux-info/pnp/ XFree86 Matrox Team http://www.bf.rmit.edu.au/~ajv/xf86-matrox.html
| |