[lkml]   [1997]   [Dec]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
SubjectRe: Problems in tty_ioctl?
   Date: 	Mon, 29 Dec 1997 20:04:09 +0200 (EET)
From: T Taneli Vahakangas <vahakang@cs.Helsinki.FI>

I am using kernel version 2.1.76. Today, I tried a program called
9term (it's a terminal emulator for X) and wondered why did it exit
right after pressing a key. To my amusement, the program died because
of an oops (attached, but looks weird). The kernel stumbled in

The following patch cures the problem, but probably not the cause:

The patch is almost right, actually. The main problem is that you
should never return ENOIOCTLCMD to the user-level code. Enclosed is a
better patch, which should work against 2.1.76 even though it was made
against 2.1.75.

- Ted

Patch generated: on Wed Dec 31 17:54:32 EST 1997 by tytso@rsts-11
against Linux version 2.1.75

RCS file: drivers/char/RCS/tty_io.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 drivers/char/tty_io.c
--- drivers/char/tty_io.c 1997/12/31 21:49:20 1.1
+++ drivers/char/tty_io.c 1997/12/31 21:50:59
@@ -1548,12 +1548,16 @@
switch(cmd) {
- return tty->driver.ioctl(tty, file, cmd, arg);
+ if (tty->driver.ioctl)
+ return tty->driver.ioctl(tty, file, cmd, arg);
+ return -EINVAL;

/* These two ioctl's always return success; even if */
/* the driver doesn't support them. */
case TCSBRK:
- case TCSBRKP:
+ case TCSBRKP:
+ if (!tty->driver.ioctl)
+ return 0;
retval = tty->driver.ioctl(tty, file, cmd, arg);
if (retval == -ENOIOCTLCMD)
retval = 0;
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.048 / U:1.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site