Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Dec 1997 21:47:47 +0000 (GMT) | From | Egor Egorov <> | Subject | Re: again security proposal |
| |
On Mon, 29 Dec 1997, Yuri Kuzmenko wrote:
> configurable option, and we need to make subsection in kernel config for > security "features"
Well...
I have one proposal. While I work quiet near Yuri, I don't agree with him. Of _course_ we cannot afford such a costly thing as standard violation in this ugly way.
But. We can concider denial of not-owner-hardlinks as a security feature for some special systems. I.e. this can be security option in kernel.
Thoose, who wants it this way - will enable it. For example, near everybody who runs ifmail, will need it.
I can even imagine not-owner-hardlinks as not the only security option in security options config sections.
What do you think?
// Егор Егоров. // http://frigate.kiev.ua/~egor/
| |