[lkml]   [1997]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Filesystem optimization..
    In article <> you write:
    >While staring dejectedly at a filesystem holding a tad of 3 million
    >files, and looking at the 'orrible latency to open a file, it occured
    >to me that with most usage patterns, two things are true:

    How many of these files are actually accessed within an our? Or within
    a day?

    > 1) There are very few inodes that have more than one parent
    > (i.e. more than one filename pointing to them)

    No, a news spool of INN actually contains many hard links.

    > 3) On most modern hard disks, the cost of reading 4K as
    > opposed to reading 1K is minute (it's dominated by
    > seek times etc).

    It could actually speed up access. But I think prefetching is
    done already anyway, at various levels.

    >Then it occured to me that if you force aligning inodes on 64 byte
    >boundries, the addressable filesystem goes to 256gig (probably enough
    >for now).

    No. Terabyte disk arrays already exist, and terabyte disks and files
    will be there within a few years. If we ignore this we end up with
    a degenerate system like Windoze.

    >Comments?? (people dying to implement such a beast? :)

    I guess something should be done, but not this way. There are
    several new filesystems under construction. Perhaps one of these
    can implement some optimizations.


    Veni, Vidi, VISA:
    I came, I saw, I did a little shopping.

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.023 / U:29.892 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site