lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectModule versioning (was: Re: OFFTOPIC: binary modules, bad idea!)
    Date
    From

    Theodore T'so wrote:
    [...]
    : However, storing the information in a separate ELF section doesn't
    : solve this, unless you actually have GCC generate the hash code.
    : (If you store the hash code in slab.ver, you'd still have the same
    : problem.) In fact, if you have GCC generate the hash code, it'd
    : solve this problem whether the hash code is stored as part of the
    : symbol name, or in a separate ELF section.
    [...]

    Hmm, for ELF-based systems, one could try to use ELF symbol versioning
    instead of a hash-code and since that is already part of the current
    binutils it should not be a problem. The question however is if that
    is sufficient for our purposes? Could someone with more understanding
    how module versioning works comment on this?

    Dominik Kubla

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.017 / U:1.588 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site