lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.1.72 /proc, was: Re: /proc/memmap [name from inode?]
Chris Evans wrote:

> Oh, here's something you can do to a 2.1.72 kernel, that's fairly nasty:
> (as root):
>
> rm -f /proc/net/arp
>
> I'm currently messing with the /proc code, so might sort it out.

I added unlink support to /proc as an experiment, as in principle
there's no reason that a dynamic entry shouldn't use it. But if some
don't entries don't want to be removed (or will need changes to support
it), there should probably be a flag indicating whether the unlink
should be ignored.

Regards,
Bill

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.050 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site