lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: copy-bit macro
   From: Stefan Monnier <monnier+lists/linux/kernel/news/@TEQUILA.SYSTEMSZ.CS.YALE.EDU>
Date: 11 Dec 1997 17:59:10 -0500

"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU> writes:
> (1 << OUT_FLAG_NUMBER) : 0") both involve an assembly language
> conditional jump instruction, which is expensive, because it involves
> pipeline stalls, etc.

Has it been measured ? I know that branch prediction is not 100%, but
I'm just trying to make sure we're not trying to solve a non-problem (if the
prediction works well, then the jump costs 0 (zero) cycles).

Branch prediction works in conditional testing when branching out of
loops. In the cases where you'd use copy_bit(), it isn't in a loop
condition, and yes it matters.

- Ted

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.029 / U:1.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site