[lkml]   [1997]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: OFFTOPIC: Re: bzip2 for kernel dists?
Mitch Davis <> writes:

> Other people's mileage may vary, but I have found bunzip2 to be
> absolutely hideously SLLOOOWWW. The following test shows bunzip2
> to be 10 times slower to decompress than gunzip:

To point out the obvious, while 25 seconds might be a long time for
unpacking an archive, it is not particularly long for a multi-megabyte
download. With a 64Kb line, a megabyte takes about sixteen seconds
under optimal conditions - if you can shave a couple of Mb off the
distribution, it will clearly be worth it to many users. (And even to
ftp-site owners the reduced network load on the server might be worth
the extra disk space for *both* compression types - or even the CPU cost
of compressing on the fly - although that is more dubious)

If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.022 / U:1.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site