lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: New Small Cyrix patch
It's a Cyrix 686 P150+.  Definately a 1rev.5.  When the NT/Cyrix bug was
found I grabbed their CPUID and that's what it was then, and that's what
linux reports today. Never had too much trouble with it.

Seth

P.S. Attached my /proc/CPUINFO.

There is no Emotion, There is Peace
There is no Ignorance, There is Knowledge
There is no Passion, There is Serenity
There is no Death, There is the *****

On Tue, 18 Nov 1997, Linux Developer wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Nov 1997, seth wrote:
>
> > Not to cause too much noise, but VSPM seems to work fine on my Step 1 Rev.
> > 5. Haven't had any problems for a long time (since the first 2.0.x cyrix
> > patch)
>
> Interesting.. you're sure it's Step1/Rev5? Which speed? I had a Step1/Rev6
> Cx6x86 PR166+, and VSPM did NOT work on it. Maybe a brief working period
> in step1/rev5's? :)
>
> -Phillip R. Jaenke [InterNIC Handle: PRJ5] (kernel@prj.pcimporters.com)
> MIS Department, PC Importers, Inc. 800.319.9284, x4262
> Head of Development, The Improvement Linux Project.
> Penguin0: Cyrix Cx6x86 PR200L+, 64M, 1.6G, 1.2G, 4.3G, EE/Pro, 2.0.30
> Penguin1: Intel P5-100, 32M, 4G, NE2k, 2.1.60-Improvement
> The Diamond FireGL Series - When you're ready for a REAL video card.
>
>
processor : 0
cpu family : 5
model : 6x86 2x Core/Bus Clock
vendor_id : CyrixInstead
stepping : 1 rev 5
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
sep_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 2097153
wp : yes
flags : fpu
bogomips : 121.24
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.044 / U:1.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site