Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Nov 1997 22:08:55 -0700 (MST) | From | seth <> | Subject | Re: New Small Cyrix patch |
| |
It's a Cyrix 686 P150+. Definately a 1rev.5. When the NT/Cyrix bug was found I grabbed their CPUID and that's what it was then, and that's what linux reports today. Never had too much trouble with it.
Seth
P.S. Attached my /proc/CPUINFO.
There is no Emotion, There is Peace There is no Ignorance, There is Knowledge There is no Passion, There is Serenity There is no Death, There is the *****
On Tue, 18 Nov 1997, Linux Developer wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 1997, seth wrote: > > > Not to cause too much noise, but VSPM seems to work fine on my Step 1 Rev. > > 5. Haven't had any problems for a long time (since the first 2.0.x cyrix > > patch) > > Interesting.. you're sure it's Step1/Rev5? Which speed? I had a Step1/Rev6 > Cx6x86 PR166+, and VSPM did NOT work on it. Maybe a brief working period > in step1/rev5's? :) > > -Phillip R. Jaenke [InterNIC Handle: PRJ5] (kernel@prj.pcimporters.com) > MIS Department, PC Importers, Inc. 800.319.9284, x4262 > Head of Development, The Improvement Linux Project. > Penguin0: Cyrix Cx6x86 PR200L+, 64M, 1.6G, 1.2G, 4.3G, EE/Pro, 2.0.30 > Penguin1: Intel P5-100, 32M, 4G, NE2k, 2.1.60-Improvement > The Diamond FireGL Series - When you're ready for a REAL video card. > > processor : 0 cpu family : 5 model : 6x86 2x Core/Bus Clock vendor_id : CyrixInstead stepping : 1 rev 5 fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no sep_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 2097153 wp : yes flags : fpu bogomips : 121.24
| |