[lkml]   [1997]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: dentries rule. [was: Re: Pros and cons of newer kernels]

    On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Mike Jagdis wrote:

    > On Tue, 18 Nov 1997, Steven N. Hirsch wrote:
    > > 2.0.31: 0.72user 5.11system 0:06.19elapsed 94%CPU (486/133)
    > >
    > > 2.1.64: 0.32user 0.57system 0:17.04elapsed 5%CPU (6x86 P150+)
    > >
    > >
    > > Just a bit of difference in the CPU usage, no? Any suggestions as to why
    > > the 6x86 shows so little CPU use? Top shows the system as being 97%
    > > idle! Could this be some odd misbehavior with the Cyrix idle patch?
    > It looks like the 6x86 machine spent around 10 seconds waiting
    > for I/O. Almost as if your hard disk interrupts aren't bringing
    > the processor out of hlt (but others must be). What do you get
    > without suspend on halt enabled or booting with the no-hlt boot
    > option?
    > Mike

    Shouldn't it be possible to just shut off suspend-on-halt with:

    set6x86 -p 0xC2 -c 0x08 ??

    I tried that a moment ago, and it made no difference. If this is actually
    a parameter that must be set at boot, I'll try that a bit later this

    Thanks for the pointer.


     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.018 / U:20.312 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site