[lkml]   [1997]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.1.63 - testing Pentium bug workaround..

On Thu, 13 Nov 1997, David S. Miller wrote:
> I would expect possible bugs in the mul/div insns with lock prefixes,
> they can be locked can't they? If so do they have illegal addressing
> modes you can form invalid opcodes with?

No, mul/div can't be locked. There aren't all that many instructions that
can, and I personally think that the cmpxchg8b thing is the only one that
shows _this_ particular problem. There might be other bugs out there,
obviously, but I think this one is solved.


 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.079 / U:0.364 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site