[lkml]   [1997]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.1.63 - testing Pentium bug workaround..

    On Thu, 13 Nov 1997, David S. Miller wrote:
    > I would expect possible bugs in the mul/div insns with lock prefixes,
    > they can be locked can't they? If so do they have illegal addressing
    > modes you can form invalid opcodes with?

    No, mul/div can't be locked. There aren't all that many instructions that
    can, and I personally think that the cmpxchg8b thing is the only one that
    shows _this_ particular problem. There might be other bugs out there,
    obviously, but I think this one is solved.


     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:0.017 / U:0.600 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site