Messages in this thread | | | From | (Alan Cox) | Subject | Re: Linux Kernels | Date | Fri, 31 Oct 1997 08:47:36 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
> certain denial of service attacks. (yes i know about ipfwadm, but i dont > like using it). Also, about ipfwadm, i think linux kernel's should come
hehe..
> that this method would be 90 times easier then ipfwadm with the 300 diff > -options and its much easier to access/change the list then ipfwadm. I > think the program should be run like inetd.conf, where u need to kill -HUP > <whatever ps> to refresh it. > I'd just like something similar or better then this implemented in > an upcoming *stable* kernel version. Send me your comments/suggestions...
It isnt a kernel issue. ipfwadm is a user program. Nothing stops you writing the tool you describe and without rewriting any kernel code.
Alan
| |