lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Linux Kernels
Date
> certain denial of service attacks. (yes i know about ipfwadm, but i dont
> like using it). Also, about ipfwadm, i think linux kernel's should come

hehe..

> that this method would be 90 times easier then ipfwadm with the 300 diff
> -options and its much easier to access/change the list then ipfwadm. I
> think the program should be run like inetd.conf, where u need to kill -HUP
> <whatever ps> to refresh it.
> I'd just like something similar or better then this implemented in
> an upcoming *stable* kernel version. Send me your comments/suggestions...

It isnt a kernel issue. ipfwadm is a user program. Nothing stops you writing
the tool you describe and without rewriting any kernel code.

Alan



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:40    [W:1.752 / U:0.740 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site