[lkml]   [1997]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Should depmod/modprobe really need libg++
Robin Becker writes:
> I just tried out the latest 970301 modutils with Linus-2.1.20 still
> no luck.
> In addition depmod/modprobe requires yet another library libg++.
> Is this wise? My rescue disks are already large enough and since
> typical usage requires depmod & modprobe at boot more space is needed
> either for the additional library or for the libg++ bit to be statically
> linked in. I certainly don't remember libg++ being part of the essential
> libraries in the FSSTD. What's going on with the modutils?

This is very bad. The modutils are critical for install/rescue
discs. We can't afford to have libg++ on a floppy. Please, all those
writing critical system utilities: don't use g++. We can't afford the
bloat or the bugs.



 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.032 / U:0.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site