lkml.org 
[lkml]   [1997]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: A couple "normal user" questions..
On Thu, 30 Jan 1997, Craig Milo Rogers wrote:

> >> /proc/config
> ...
> >I don't want 8K of my kernel wasted because I can't remember to save config
> >files.
>
> Perhaps this should be a config option? CONFIG_PROC_CONFIG?

I would add that this is far from 8K. For the following reason

-You store only what is being configured in the kernel
if it is not it is not.
-Many configuration option are visible in /proc already
-Stuff selected as module don't need to told. they are modules
anyway.

This would amount at few hundred byte to the most. I have done something
like this 2 years ago. I have added a minor modification to the current
config script and it was possible to extract "useful" configuration
information and build /proc/config dynamicly at kernel compile time. In
the config script, I was flagging the config option which were useful
(because their status could not be grabbed at run time from other mean).



--------------------------------------------------------
Jacques Gelinas (jacques@solucorp.qc.ca)
Linuxconf: The ultimate administration system for Linux.
see http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:38    [W:0.053 / U:1.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site